JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 25, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Maria Elena Marquez Sanchez Vs. Nueva Eps

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Juzgado Veintiuno Administrativo Del Circuito De Medellin Y El Juzgado Veinticinco Penal Municipal Con Funciones De Control De Garantias. Se Resolvio Remitir El Expediente De La Referencia Al Juzgado Veintiuno Administrativo Del Circuito De Medellin Para Que Tramite Y Decida La Accion De Tutela En Cuestion.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Competencia A Prevención En Tutela
  • Obligación de proceder con diligencia ante asunto que demanda procedimiento preferente para procurar la protección inmediata de los derechos fundamentales dando lugar a un fallo de inmediato cumplimiento
Accion De Tutela Contra La Nueva Eps
  • Competencia de Juzgado Administrativo del Circuito
  • Conocimiento directo de la Corte Constitucional en aras de garantizar sin más dilación el acceso a la administración de justicia
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Remitir el expediente de la referencia, por intermedio de la Secretaria General, al Juzgado Veintiuno Administrativo del Circuito de Medellin, para que en ejercicio de sus competencias constitucionales y legales, tramite y decida la accion de tutela instaurada por la senora Maria Elena Marquez Sanchez contra "la Nueva EPS".
  2. Informese esta decision, ademas, al Juzgado Veinticinco Penal Municipal con Funcion de Control de Garantias de Medellin.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.